When analyzing an argument, introducing a plausible counter-example primarily serves to:
A
Demonstrate the writer's extensive knowledge of the subject matter.
B
Directly disprove the argument's main conclusion.
C
Highlight a potential scenario where the argument's reasoning might fail.
D
Offer an alternative solution to the problem discussed in the argument.
✓ Correct Answer: Option C
Counter-examples show that the argument's conclusion does not necessarily follow from its premises, revealing a weakness in its logic by presenting a plausible alternative outcome or scenario.
💡 Why is C) the correct answer?
The correct answer to the question "When analyzing an argument, introducing a plausible counter-example primarily serves to:" is Option C: Highlight a potential scenario where the argument's reasoning might fail..
The other options — A) Demonstrate the writer's extensive knowledge of the subject matter., B) Directly disprove the argument's main conclusion., D) Offer an alternative solution to the problem discussed in the argument. — are incorrect for this GMAT Exam Prep question. As explained above: Counter-examples show that the argument's conclusion does not necessarily follow from its premises, revealing a weakness in its logic by presenting a plausible alternative outcome or scenario.
📚 About This GMAT Exam Prep Practice Question
This 3-level GMAT Exam Prep question from the Analytical Writing topic is part of BrainForge Quiz's free exam preparation library.
Each question includes the correct answer and a detailed explanation to help you understand the underlying concept, not just memorize the answer.
How to use this page: Read the question above, consider all four options (A through D),
then check the highlighted correct answer and explanation. For active timed practice, start a
free GMAT Exam Prep practice test
or use flashcards for spaced repetition review.