A project manager needs to assign two tasks from a list of five to maximize efficiency. Each task has a listed efficiency improvement score and required hours. The total work hours for the two selected tasks must not exceed 15 hours. Task | Efficiency Improvement Score | Required Hours -----|----------------------------|--------------- Task P | 80 | 10 Task Q | 70 | 8 Task R | 60 | 7 Task S | 50 | 6 Task T | 40 | 5 Select two tasks that, when combined, offer the greatest total efficiency improvement while adhering to the 15-hour constraint. (Select one option for 'Task 1' and one option for 'Task 2'.)

✓ Correct Answer: Option B

Evaluate combinations: P+Q (150 score, 18 hrs - too many), P+R (140 score, 17 hrs - too many). P+S (130 score, 16 hrs - too many). P+T (120 score, 15 hrs - valid). Q+R (130 score, 15 hrs - valid). Q+S (120 score, 14 hrs - valid). R+S (110 score, 13 hrs - valid). The combination of Task P (80 score, 10 hrs) and Task T (40 score, 5 hrs) yields a total score of 120 and 15 hours. The combination of Task Q (70 score, 8 hrs) and Task R (60 score, 7 hrs) yields a total score of 130 and 15 hours. Task Q and Task S (70+50=120, 8+6=14hrs). Task P + Task R is 80+60=140 score, 10+7=17 hours, which exceeds 15 hours. I need to recheck my analysis or make options clearer. Oh, wait, the question asks for two options from a list of A,B,C,D where each option is a *pair* of tasks. This is not a 'two-part analysis' where I select individual tasks. It is a standard multiple choice asking which *pair* is best.