⚖️ LSAT Exam Prep

"We should require helmets for cyclists because we require seatbelts for drivers." This reasoning relies on:

A Statistical evidence
B Analogy — comparing two similar situations to justify similar treatment
C Expert testimony
D Circular reasoning

✓ Correct Answer: Option B

The argument draws an analogy: seatbelt requirements and helmet requirements serve similar safety functions, so one justifies the other.

Related LSAT Exam Prep Questions