⚖️ LSAT Exam Prep

"Three witnesses identified the suspect. Witness identification is sometimes unreliable. Therefore, the suspect may be innocent." This argument:

A Is logically valid — the conclusion follows from the premises
B Commits the fallacy of hasty generalization
C Is an appeal to ignorance
D Uses circular reasoning

✓ Correct Answer: Option A

The conclusion ("may be innocent") is modest and follows logically. Since identifications are "sometimes unreliable," it is possible the suspect is innocent.

Related LSAT Exam Prep Questions