⚖️ LSAT Exam Prep

"Proponents say X reduces crime. But in city Y, X was implemented and crime rose. Thus X does not reduce crime." The argument uses:

A A counterexample to challenge a general claim
B An appeal to ignorance
C Circular reasoning
D An analogy

✓ Correct Answer: Option A

The argument challenges the general claim (X reduces crime) by citing a specific counterexample (city Y). This is argument by counterexample.

Related LSAT Exam Prep Questions