"If the defendant is guilty, he had motive. The defendant had motive." Can we conclude guilt?

A Yes, the defendant is guilty

B No — having motive does not prove guilt

C Yes, because motive implies guilt

D Only if there is also opportunity

✓ Correct Answer: Option B

This is affirming the consequent. Motive is necessary but not sufficient for guilt. Many people may have motive without committing the crime.

💡 Why is B) the correct answer?

The correct answer to the question ""If the defendant is guilty, he had motive. The defendant had motive." Can we conclude guilt?" is Option B: No — having motive does not prove guilt.

The other options — A) Yes, the defendant is guilty, C) Yes, because motive implies guilt, D) Only if there is also opportunity — are incorrect for this LSAT Exam Prep question. As explained above: This is affirming the consequent. Motive is necessary but not sufficient for guilt. Many people may have motive without committing the crime.

📚 About This LSAT Exam Prep Practice Question

This 2-level LSAT Exam Prep question from the Logical Reasoning topic is part of BrainForge Quiz's free exam preparation library. Each question includes the correct answer and a detailed explanation to help you understand the underlying concept, not just memorize the answer.

How to use this page: Read the question above, consider all four options (A through D), then check the highlighted correct answer and explanation. For active timed practice, start a free LSAT Exam Prep practice test or use flashcards for spaced repetition review.

Practice LSAT Exam Prep Quizzes → Browse All Questions Study Flashcards

"If the defendant is guilty, he had motive. The defendant had motive." Can we conclude guilt?

✓ Correct Answer: Option B

📚 About This LSAT Exam Prep Practice Question

Related LSAT Exam Prep Questions