⚖️ LSAT Exam Prep

"If the defendant is guilty, he had motive. The defendant had motive." Can we conclude guilt?

A Yes, the defendant is guilty
B No — having motive does not prove guilt
C Yes, because motive implies guilt
D Only if there is also opportunity

✓ Correct Answer: Option B

This is affirming the consequent. Motive is necessary but not sufficient for guilt. Many people may have motive without committing the crime.

Related LSAT Exam Prep Questions