If an LSAT prompt gives two criteria (cost-effectiveness and public impact), and Option A is better for cost but Option B is better for impact, which approach works best?

The correct answer to the question "If an LSAT prompt gives two criteria (cost-effectiveness and public impact), and Option A is better for cost but Option B is better for impact, which approach works best?" is Option B: Pick one and argue that the criterion it satisfies is more important in this context, while still addressing the other.

The other options — A) Flip a coin, C) Say both are equally good, D) Argue neither option works — are incorrect for this LSAT Exam Prep question. As explained above: When each option excels at a different criterion, argue why the criterion your chosen option satisfies is more important given the specific circumstances.