⚖️ LSAT Exam Prep

An LSAT prompt has criteria: "maximize community engagement" and "minimize cost." Option A has high engagement but high cost. Option B has moderate engagement and low cost. How should you argue for Option A?

A Ignore the cost criterion
B Argue that the engagement gains are so significant they justify the higher cost, and that Option B's savings are offset by its lower impact
C Claim Option A is cheaper
D Argue that cost does not matter

✓ Correct Answer: Option B

Address both criteria honestly. Argue that the magnitude of the engagement advantage outweighs the cost difference, showing a reasoned priority among criteria.

Related LSAT Exam Prep Questions