⚖️ LSAT Exam Prep

A and B are investigating a case. A says: "The butler did it because he had access to the room." B says: "The gardener also had access." What does B's response accomplish?

A It proves the gardener is guilty
B It shows that access alone is insufficient to identify the culprit — another person also had access
C It is irrelevant
D It supports A's conclusion

✓ Correct Answer: Option B

B provides a counterexample showing access is not unique to the butler. If the gardener also had access, access cannot single out the butler.

Related LSAT Exam Prep Questions